Implementation Shortfall

Implementation shortfall is the difference between the price when you decided to trade and the result you actually achieved, including spreads, market impact, fees and any part of the order that was never filled.

Implementation shortfall measures the gap between the price when you decided to trade and the result you actually got, including the shares that never filled. It captures the full cost of acting on an idea.

Category
Market Structure
Reading time
3 min
Also called
Arrival price slippage, Perold shortfall
Updated

Implementation shortfall in plain words

Implementation shortfall measures trading cost as the gap between the price when you decided to trade and what you actually achieved — including any shares you meant to buy but never got.1

It captures the full cost of acting on an investment decision, explicit and hidden alike.2

That includes market impact, the cost of delay and the opportunity cost of unfilled orders.2

How to calculate implementation shortfall

  1. Record the decision price

    Record the market price at the moment you decide to trade.1

  2. Record fills

    Note every executed price and size.

  3. Add fees

    Include commissions and other explicit costs.

  4. Measure delay and impact

    Split the total into market impact, delay and opportunity cost.2

  5. Count unfilled shares

    Price the missed shares against the decision price.

  6. Sum and compare

    Total cost covers all explicit and implicit trading costs.2

Worked examples

Example 1 — Full fill

210

Decision 50.00; buy 1,000 at avg 50.20; fees 10.

Example 1 — Full fill — calculation
Price cost200
Fees10
Total210

The cost is measured against the price at the moment of the decision.1

Example 2 — Partial fill

460

Decision 20.00; intend 1,000; fill 600 at 20.10; close 21.00.

Example 2 — Partial fill — calculation
Executed cost60
Opportunity cost400 × 1.00 = 400
Total460

Unfilled shares count too, so the missed part adds 400 to the shortfall.1

Example 3 — vs VWAP

IS is stricter

Same trade looks cheap against VWAP.

Example 3 — vs VWAP — calculation
VWAP costLow

Measured against VWAP the cost looks smaller, because VWAP often misses an order's own market impact.2

Implementation shortfall vs VWAP benchmark

AspectImplementation shortfallVWAP
BenchmarkDecision priceDay's average price
Unfilled sharesCountedIgnored
Impact captureStrongWeak
GamingHardEasier

Where IS is used

Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages

  • Captures all trading costs.
  • Counts missed trades.
  • Hard to game.

Disadvantages

  • No single accepted formula.
  • Needs exact decision timestamps.
  • Opportunity cost depends on a chosen end price.
  • More data work than VWAP.

Going deeper

Read as far as you need. Each level builds on the one before it.

Parts

Beginner

Hidden costs come from the spread, market impact, delay and orders that never fill.2

Why use it

Intermediate

Its strengths: it counts every cost and is hard to game.1

Caveat

Advanced

There is no single agreed way to calculate it for a whole portfolio.1

Common mistakes

  1. Ignoring unfilled shares

    Missed trades are a cost.

  2. Wrong start price

    Use the decision price.

  3. Only using VWAP

    VWAP can hide impact.

  4. Leaving out fees

    Add explicit costs.

Check your understanding

Test yourself before moving on. Each answer comes with an explanation.

Q1Decision 10.00, fill 500 at 10.04, fees 5. IS =
Q2IS differs from VWAP by…

Key points to remember

  1. IS compares results with the decision price.
  2. It includes impact, delay and opportunity costs.
  3. Unfilled shares count.
  4. It is harder to game than VWAP.
  5. There is no single accepted formula.

Frequently asked questions

Is IS only for funds?

No, any trader can use it with good records.

What end price for missed shares?

Commonly the close or a set horizon price.

Can IS be negative?

Yes, if the market moved in your favour.

Further learning

Sources

This article is written in our own words. The sources below support the specific facts, rules and figures marked with a number in the text. Links open the original publisher’s page.

  1. U.S. SEC. Request for Comments on Measures To Improve Disclosure of Mutual Fund Transaction Costs (opens in a new tab) Checked .
  2. CFA Institute. Trading Costs and Electronic Markets (opens in a new tab) Checked .

Educational content, not financial advice. Examples use hypothetical prices and simplified costs; actual fees, margin rules and regulations vary by broker, market and country. We are not affiliated with any publisher linked above. Last reviewed . Report an error or request a source credit.